Climate Engineering Denial And Deception, Holding Mainstream Media Accountable
Dane Wigington geoengineeringwatch.org Should we consider it acceptable for mainstream media news anchors and their "chief meteorologists" to completely ignore and marginalize the legitimate and verifiable concerns of the public that they claim to represent? Should we just stand silently by while media and meteorological "professionals" (that the community depends on) willfully blackout critical issues (that relate directly to public health and welfare) without doing a shred of honest or legitimate investigation? The short answer is no, we cannot, we must not accept such a betrayal of the public's trust. In Northern California, KRCR is an ABC affiliate that covers the North State. The chain of short messages below are my attempt to hold the ABC news anchor for KRCR (and their chief meteorologist) accountable by simply asking them to address the public's concerns in a town hall setting. This effort has been ongoing. The ABC news anchor finally gives a very unprofessional and completely inadequate response. A 40 year veteran Aerospace Avionics Engineer then directly addresses the ABC news anchor with his own letter which fully supports the reality of global geoengineering and our efforts to expose the ongoing atmospheric aerosol crimes. 1st Request Hello Mr. Kruger and Mr. Mangas, As I am sure you are aware, the rapidly growing public concerns over the issue of climate engineering continues to accelerate. As meteorological and media representatives for the North State (through KRCR), it is my hope that you will agree to accept this formal invitation to attend a locally staged public forum (in a town hall setting) in order to address the public's questions and concerns about what we see constantly occurring in our skies. The lingering expanding jet aircraft trails often haze out the entire skyline (which is the stated goal of "solar radiation management" programs). If (as the KRCR chief meteorologist) Mr. Kruger believes climate engineering is not in fact going on, the public would like to know on what facts and information such a conclusion is based. I, and many others, hope you will accept this sincere invitation to address our concerns as our local weather and media representatives. If so, we would coordinate a date, time, and location for the meeting that would be acceptable to your schedules. Sincerely Dane Wigington geoengineeringwatch.org Verifiable facts sent for consideration: Federal "gag order" on all NWS and NOAA employees https://dev.geoengineeringwatch.org/government-implements-illegal-gag-order-on-national-weather-service-and-noaa/ Links to numerous film footage clips of jet aircraft spraying https://dev.geoengineeringwatch.org/category/audio-video/aircraft-spraying-videos/ New Science Study Examines Methods To Gain Public Acceptance Of Climate Engineering https://dev.geoengineeringwatch.org/new-science-study-examines-methods-to-gain-public-acceptance-of-climate-engineering/ New Science Study Comes Closer To Disclosing The Catastrophic Health And Environmental Consequences Of Climate Engineering https://dev.geoengineeringwatch.org/new-science-study-comes-closer-to-disclosing-the-catastrophic-health-and-environmental-consequences-of-climate-engineering/ Massive Senate Document On National And Global Weather Modification https://dev.geoengineeringwatch.org/massive-us-senate-document-on-national-and-global-weather-modification/ Historical presidential report documenting ongoing and expanding climate engineering programs https://dev.geoengineeringwatch.org/documents-library/ Extensive list of climate engineering patents https://dev.geoengineeringwatch.org/an-extensive-list-of-patents/ Solar radiation management governance initiative http://www.srmgi.org 2nd Request Hello Mr. Kruger and Mr. Mangas, I hope you would be kind enough to issue a response to the request sent last week. As mentioned in the former message, public concerns about climate engineering are escalating rapidly, it would seem appropriate for the chief meteorologist that represents our region to at least be willing to address the public's concerns in a town hall setting. Thank you for your consideration to this second request. Sincerely Dane Wigington geoengineeringwatch.org 3rd Request Hello Mr. Kruger and Mr. Mangas, we are all still hoping you will be willing to answer questions from the public to address our concerns about what is happening in our skies. The photo attached was captured today from the NASA worldview site, what could cause such a cloud formation? This is one of the many questions we would like to have addressed at a town hall meeting at a date, time, and location, that would suite your schedule. Again, as the local chief meteorologist that represents our region, we hope you will be willing to address our questions and concerns. Sincerely Dane Wigington geoengineeringwatch.org What could cause an alarming cloud formation like what is shown below? And on such a vast scale? 4th Request Hello again Mr. Kruger and Mr. Mangas, still hoping to have the courtesy of a response regarding the communities requests to have their questions and concerns about climate engineering addressed in a public town hall setting. Below is a satellite photo taken today over Northern California. It reveals an atmosphere that is completely saturated with aerosols which look more like blowing smoke on the radar image as opposed to natural cumulous or cirrus clouds. Smoke is of course a particulate, climate engineering/solar radiation management patents and programs expressly call for saturating the atmosphere with light scattering particulates dispersed from jet aircraft. If (as our chief meteorologist) Mr. Kruger feels our concerns are unfounded, and that we should not believe what we can see with our own eyes, we would be very interested in hearing on what basis of facts he comes to such a conclusion. Sincerely Dane Wigington geoengineeringwatch.org First response from KRCR ABC news anchor Mike Mangas On Feb 18, 2016, at 6:20 PM, Mike Mangas wrote: Hello Dane- I apologize for not responding to your emails. I didn't see them – to be absolutely honest, I blocked them some time ago. Going into the geoengineering debate, I tried to keep an open mind. I listened to you, to your followers, showed up at the seminar you had in the David Marr auditorium, and did online research. I'm not a scientist, and don't pretend to be, but of the things I could confirm, I have found lies, mistruths, conspiracy theories of all sorts (and not just geoengineering. That forum had a cornucopia of conspiracy theories. Who shot Kennedy, what really happened on 9-11, did we really go to the moon, etc.) Reading things like we the media are being paid off by the government to keep things quiet, or to believe humans are capable of intentionally altering the environment on a global scale, for nefarious purposes, or that such an alleged massive operation could be done in complete secrecy, and talking