41 Responses

1. I have wondered why the sun seems so damn bright in the last few years, for sure since 2015, and figured it was due to geoengineering spraying actions. With the heat from the sun feeling like it burns just standing in it and the sun being super bright white colored I concluded the ozone holes referred to in the 80's have gotten worse but I didn't realize just how badly damaged the ozone was until recently. At least now i have an answer to brighter sun issue.

   Solutions: Are there any?

   Yes I think there are solutions but they require the human race to give up fossil fuels for energy production and the removal of all gas burning cars from the surface of the Earth. That alone would reverse this over time but it won't happen, people would rather die than give up their cars and electrical appliances. So here we are wondering what we can do to stop this but at the same time unwilling to make the necessary changes to prevent the damage caused from getting worse.

   If you have 50% less tress and the loss of tons of plankton in approximately 100 years while the output of harmful gases is at an all time high how can anyone conclude a positive result from this much biosphere damage. To simplify things, people can't keep burning tires, coal and such when the oxygen required to ignite them is very low or just gone in some areas.

   Thinking about it more, that will lead to an atmosphere where we are suffocating in it. I think many of the health problems people are feeling come from a lack of concentration of oxygen overall. With atmospheric dead zone popping up around the world.

   Other solutions such as going green sound nice but at this point way to expensive for regular (non-rich) folks to afford it. Perhaps the government of the U.S. should give up on healthcare for all and instead focus on using grants/tax money/etc. to install solar panels on every home in America. This would reduce the need for so many coal fired and natural gas power plants, and reduce the amount of carbon dust and oxides being released by mankind daily, nonstop. Then there wouldn't be a need to fly over us and dump light scattering particles in a pathetic attempt to keep business as usual. Don't the rich know, the game is over and they must stop profiteering at the cost of our planet. What good is money and power if there is no one left to impose your will on? The planet can not keep up with the demands of mankind nor replace renewable resources fast enough and our collective greed for the latest and greatest is going to kill us all.

   Reply

2. Increasing solar UV-B radiation is the result of ozone depletion and reduced concentrations of atmospheric terpenes, aerosols that used to be produced by the boreal forests and marine phytoplankton at twice the  volume, just fifty years ago, compared with current levels.

   Reply

   1. Wow, 'atmospheric terpenes." This is certainly something most people don't consider.  Geoengineering destroys the ozone layer!  WTF it is so obvious it has to stop. It disrupts the earths natural ozone generation process.  Our greatest threat- arrogance. 

3. This is all I could find "A new paper published in Theoretical and Applied Climatology finds that solar UV radiation at an observatory in Austria has significantly increased at a rate of up to 14% per decade from 1997-2011. The paper notes ozone "cannot explain these significant increases""

   Reply

4. I'm in the Manchester area in the UK. I have a SPER 850009 UV meter. Readings today 12.26 mw/cm. According to this source http://www.uv-light.co.uk/health-and-safety/comparison-of-elvs-with-natural-sunlight.php, average summer time UVA at noon is 2.8. Unless I'm interpreting my readings incorrectly, we have a huge amount of UVB cooking us, and it's not even summer yet.  

   Reply

5. Surely someone has a graph of UV (A and B)  level changes over the past 20 years or so? Except I can't find one anywhere.

   Reply

   1. Hello Michael, it is highly unlikely that you will find any such credible graph, the goal of the establishment and the agencies that serve it is to hide the radically escalating UV radiation, not to expose it. The bottom line was expressed clearly in the article in question, we are told by all major agencies that no more than 5% of incoming UV radiation should be UVB, we are seeing 50% to 60% UVB. This is 10 to 12 times more UVB than what we are being told.

6. Well since I’ve been getting somewhat sunburnt lately I decided to get serious and take some UV measurements myself but I’m a bit confused about the details. My husband hadf a look at some of the machine reccomended on the internet, Omega HHUV254SD and General Tools UVAB-513 The Omega machine weve looked at measures UVA at frequencies of 320 to 380 nm but that’s just for UVA. So the other General Tools machine my husband found measures UVAB but measures 280 to 400nm. and when it measures UVA it measures 320 to 380nm so even the one machine does an unusual overlap of frequencies.
   He says that if I just try to subtract one measurement from the other it won’t ever get an accurate result because the different machines use different values or frequency ranges for what they consider to be UVA . Since the machines measure differently he said you get the effect of certain frequency ranges being measured twice as they get measured as a component of UVA as well as UVB and that can lead to a double counting that on paper gives a much higher sum than is actually measured. It’s like having ten coloured pencils and asking one person to count the warm colours and one to count the cool colours. So one person says they counted the blues and greens and yellowgreens and got seven cool colors and the other person counted warm reds and oranges and yellows and got 6 warm colors so they got a combined total of 13 pencils!
   It’s all so confusing. Would you kind people please be able to help by showing exactly which frequencies of UV light should be measured !!! Perhaps a clear chart would be a helpful addition to this page

   Reply

   1. Hello Marthur, there will always be some meter variance, but when the visible signs of the excessive UV are everywhere, we have no reason to believe our metering is off to any significant degree. The bark is literally being fried off the sun exposed side of trees in countless locations, the backs of whales are being scorched, plankton are being radically impacted by the excessive UV. Our own skin should also be an indecater of the problem. There is no question about the ozone depletion in the northern and southern hemispheres. The ozone problem is increasingly well documented, you will find this to be the case if you continue to do objective investigation.

   2. Dane,

      This Marthur character is a fake and a fraud.  They've been on our Youtube channel commenting on some of our videos, and we ended up blocking them because they started ranting and calling others names simply because those people had different ideas.  They are more than likely a shill.  Not to be trusted.

7. OK here’s an easy question to ask that is an undeniable fact. You can ask this question and then wait for the excuses. Question — Why over the past 30-years has the appearance of the mid-day sun changed from yellow to the now blinding platinum white that it is today. — Answer – Because the ozone layer is nearly gone and it isn’t scattering the incoming light rays. So now we see the unfiltered sun. The answer is 100% correct and is undeniable. No one seems to notice this huge change in the sun even though it’s in your face everyday, it’s mind-boggling. Now that answer will lead you to more questions and eventually you’ll find alot of the answers to some big questions. Hint: Research ozone thinning experiments carried out in the 70’s aboard Skylab. Different compounds were released to find one that effectively dissipates the ozone layer. Why you ask, you’ll find out just keep looking,it should take but a few hours to find out plenty.

   Reply

   1. Being born in 1981 I am old enough to remember the sun having a yellow tint when I was younger. I started noticing the weather changed around 2011 for the worst with 2015 being the hottest winter I can recall with the temps being so warm that I was able to leave the windows open at night during the winter!

8. Strange, because only last week i had the thought to myself that the sun is really intensely hot, meaning a different kind of heat. And thought nothing more about it, until i just literally stumbled across this article from facebook. Most interesting.

   Reply

9. Here’s an update:
   After we purchased a total irradiance, whole spectrum light meter we have been seeing around 1,300 W/m2 as have others around the US using this same meter.
   By the way, this whole spectrum meter was designed for solar contractors to assess the wattage needed in the PV panel array being specified for installations.

   It is interesting that we see around the same amount of solar power on the ground as the “Solar Constant” in space. That figure, 1,360 W/m2 is an averaged number that is pretty obviously useless in ground based solar research, and a source for much confusion for those unable to think outside the pre-programmed box that the “Authorities” such as Koch Industries, DuPont Chemical or other government agencies under them dictate as reality…

   But regardless, we and others are seeing around 1,300 W/m2 of raw solar power on the ground. At the same time we are seeing around 1/10 of that total power in the UV spectrum.

   Here is where it gets scary:
   Total irradiance: 1,304 W/m2
   Total UV: 134.5 Wm2
   UVA: 55.6 W/m2
   UVB: 78.9 W/m2

   That’s right, our instruments are showing that we are seeing 30% MORE UVB than UVA!!!

   This ratio keeps climbing as it has through the nearly 100 days of data logging we have performed.

   Do the math…

   Reply

10. We are taking “direct beam” measurements, not averaged across half the planet facing the sun, so of course our numbers are higher.

    Many people including disinfo agents that believe the numbers we post are outrageously high are not taking this into account.

    We never said that the total UVA/UVB numbers were out of range, what we see that IS out of the norm is the ratio of UVB in the total UV spectrum.

    Most sources state that we should see 1%-5% of total UV spectrum as UVB. We are seeing more than 1%-5%.

    This would point to ozone degradation as a possible cause for the higher amounts of UVB than expected.

    Reply

11. I asked my Homeopath but he hasn’t replied yet. I think he’s doing some tests to present the results with hard data so we all should look forwards to that.
    I went out in the mid-day sun for a few hours on a trip to visit relatives in Brisbane and noticed a slight pinking of skin on my arms. Perhaps we should think about using some sort of sunblock cream as protection?
    Does anyone know what levels of UVB cause sunburn on the unprotected skin and how many hours it would take to notice any effect?
    That would be very useful data to add to the article above so we can all best protect ourselves

    Reply

12. That number, 14 mW/cm2 is the averaged total UV in space, or approximately 1/10 of the whole solar irradiance “constant” of 1360 W/m2.

    These numbers are averaged across the hemisphere of our planet facing the sun, not the direct beam measurements we are taking with our meters.

    Reply

13. Just a minor point, but the “Mick readings” say 14mW/cm2 in space and the ground readings are 3.2mW/cm2 – so why do you say “the ground readings are higher than in space”? {3.2 being less than 14}

    Reply

    1. Hello Ellin,
       Not sure what you saw but the ground readings are going all the way up to almost 20 mw/cm2 at times. All “official” readings from gov sources appear to be completely fictitious. You will hear more about the collapsing ozone layer from other sources soon enough. We have a full blown crisis on this issue alone, not to mention the long list of other issues that we face.

    2. It is also interesting to note that on August 29, 2013 our Maine USA observer saw 3.32mW/cm2 (33.2W/m2) on a day that the observer noted “as completely cloudy/no sun”

       On sunny days he is seeing between 11.78mW/cm2 to 13.99mW/cm2.

       As quoted from the response above:
       “The 1,353 W/m2 figure was acknowledged to be a discrepancy in 1982 when they found out the instrument calibration was lower than the actual measurements acquired by rocketry and satellite instruments at that time.”

       We have other reliable data from 2002 that shows UVA and UVB at 4.5mW/cm2 (45Wm2).

       Factor in 10+ years of stratospheric particulate injection and resultant ozone destruction on an ozone layer that was not even starting to recover and it is no mystery that we are now seeing around 4X the amount of UV that was hitting the ground on a sunny summer day in the UK in 2002…

       We likely had higher readings in Northern California than 4.5mW/cm2 (45Wm2)in 2002 since the UK is coastal with thicker atmosphere, lower elevation, more moisture content than we have here nearly 100 miles from the coast and at higher elevation of 3,000 feet.

       Scientists found very high UV readings in the Antarctic around 1976. This data was kept suppressed until around 1985. Some reports say the instruments must have been faulty, but if you remember the “UV Campaign” of the 1980s it became all too clear that something was dreadfully wrong already.

       In the 1990s, the Montreal Protocol had to be amended because the rebound of the damaged ozone layer was not happening as they had hoped.

       This gives more than ample reason to question numbers given to us by ALL government agencies since they are actively pressuring scientists to moderate their own data…

       We don’t believe that forecast models show the actual UV that is killing trees and wildlife around the world.

       Scientists are just now starting to research the whale population that is suddenly (over the last 3 or 4 years) starting to “tan” turning a darker color because of elevated UV.

       Scientists tell us that compared to healthy ozone levels, we would see seventy times the normal amounts of UV with zero ozone layer present.

       We expect to see UV levels continue to rise at an exponential rate.

14. I showed this article to my homeopath who has been treating my gout and he had some wonderful insights. I told him of my idea that they reradiate other light colours and he said I was onto something because the glow in the dark lamps at his favourite nightclubs are called “black light”
    He said the trails are possibly absorbing and storing black light energy during the night and re-emitting it during the day.

    We often get those long periods when there are no trails and he thought this is when the trails are at their most powerful due to potentisation as the trails get diluted by the huge amounts of water in the sky they mix with. The more water they mix with the greater the potentisation. He said the planes do a lot of mixing flying through the trails and stirring them and this was just like something called “succussion”. I looked it up on wikipedia.
    He said it’s so clever how the trails get stronger the less visible they are and that the global dimming makes the sun stronger than if it’s in vacuum.
    I find hard to grasp myself but I don’t have his qualifications.

    Reply

    1. Interesting Marthur. Maybe he would like to write about what he knows?

15. Thankyou kindly Dane for making these earth shattering discoveries available to us.
    We need to find out how the chemtrails are making the UV rays stronger on earth than in space. Are the chemicals absorbing all the other colours and mutating them and reradiating them out as UVB?
    I know washing powder chemicals used to do something like that. Like those fluoride paints that glow in the dark in nightclubs.
    We will probably find the chemtrails are blocking and absorbing and converting all the blue light and other colours like black from space and only letting white light and extra UVB down to earth. The people doing this probably have shares in coconut plantations to profit from the tanning creams and things like sunglasses and sombreros everyone will need for protection
    That’s a lot of money or an instrument but we should all follow Dane’s example and buy one of these meters and get some good hard science facts to fight the debunkers. Do the instructions come in English?

    Reply

    1. I am a Gardener.A few weeks ago I noticed that a yellow Potentilla had orange flowers-a week later they were all yellow again.A yellow rose started having pink flowers and a pink rose was having white flowers.They were NOT sports.I thought then that something was happening with the wavelengths of light

    2. That’s real interesting Susan. Please keep making note of what you’re seeing. I haven’t heard that particular observation before.

    3. I don’t understand how it could be stronger on earth than in space.

16. I live in Houston, TX. I’ve noticed these last few years that if I stay out in the sun for more than 30 minutes, a few hours later my skin develops a red, itchy rash. This never happened before about 2004. In fact when I was younger, I practically lived outside and always had a dark tan, especially in the summer. My sister has the same experience. Beyond the obvious chemtrails in the sky just about every day here, you can definitely see and feel your skin burning. Also our yard’s grass for the last two years is brown and dead; it’s mostly just weeds now – and two of the trees on our lot have suddenly died.

    Reply

    1. I too recently came out in itchy bumps when in the Sun.Its called PLE – Polymorphic Light Eruption and its caused by sensitivity to UV rays.Ive never had it in my Life before.

17. Thanks Dane for a well written and well researched page. Its hard to refute evidence, but even 2+2 I hear can be debated by disinformation public relations experts. Seems they always put a stick in the wheel. The truth is and shall always come to surface.

    Reply

18. Excellent information and well documented. Thank you Dane.

    Reply

19. All of these soul-less, anonymous disinfo agents, thousands upon thousands of them – we’ll never know their names. Yet I find it beyond ironic that there will come a day in the future when their lives, each and every one of them, will be gravely impacted by the very lies they each have sown.

    All of them will be impacted by chemtrails (among many other things), as well as the lives of their children and grandchildren.

    And since they have sold what’s real – their souls, our souls, and the souls of their children and grandchildren for what’s not real – some fake dollar bills, I’m sure when that day comes they will also lie to themselves and everyone else.

    I can hear the conversations now – “Mommy, daddy, did you know about this all those years ago? Did you know we would get horribly sick and terminally ill?” “No honey, we didn’t, we had no idea.” (as they lie through their teeth and avoid eye contact with their loved ones)

    They’ll have to be the ones to go to their death beds with that. Yes, that’s one thing they won’t be able to escape.

    Reply

20. We’ve noticed that our garden’s production has fallen off steadily over the last four years. My friend says hers (much larger than mine) too is off too.

    Reply

21. The corporations are the new aliens destroying the planet, and inMcCloud, CA, the critical berry and feed vegetation has failed due to high UV, the water holes are drying up, and the frogs are GONE. A dozen refugee birds were near the holes, but the rest are GONE. Insect numbers are 10-20% of normal terrestial and aquatic, and fish numbers are down.

    Reply

22. Shades of other disinformation trolls! They said EPA labs I sent my rain samples to were unreliable and biased. I suggest they write the labs directly and see what the legal responses of 100 labs might be.

    As another scientist, obviously Foote’s data is correct, and Mick is just another paid military or disinformation stooge. Get a real meter, Mick.

    Reply

23. Like many others I have noticed the increased intensity of the sun. This morning I purchased a General Tools AB UV meter from Amazon. During the purchase I noticed the availability of detectors decreasing. This article is selling detectors. Perhaps enough concerned people will be able to provide a national picture of a vs b uv radiation. Perhaps a section of geoengineeringwatch.org could be provided for people to post readings from around the world. Maybe Mr. Foote could be persuaded to do a short video presentation on the proper way to take these measurements so we all do the same thing. If enough people join this effort this could be forced into the public awareness. There are several websites where radiation readings are posted following Fukishima. Hopefully we can persuade Alex Jones to have Dean on his program. Alex has millions of listeners

    Reply

24. What will “Mick” say when all this stuff finally comes out to the public? He will go into hiding.

    Reply

25. Superb information. Well laid out and easy to answer all concerns. I would appreciate a map of the world to show where these new ozone holes are showing up.

    Please keep up the great job…don’t give up

    Reply

26. Hi Dane, we would both like to say with all our hearts THANKYOU for taking this fight to another level, we check this website daily to get the real news. We live in the NE of England and we have been creating awareness for four years now, this is all going to come to light and the snakes which have been orchestrating this madness will have to answer to we the people of Gaia. Keep fighting the good fight Dane, much respect and love to you and you family 🙂
    John and Debbie

    Reply

27. The sun is hotter on the ground here on Earth. About 10-15 years ago my aunt noticed her house plants were getting sunburned. My aunt had put her house plants outside every summer for about 40 years,(she’s 83 now). Things have definitely changed. We have had more extremes in weather in the last 10-13 years than probably the last 80 years. I think part of it is natural earth changes and part human changes.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment *

Name *

Email *

Website

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

CAPTCHA Code *